I've decided for the remainder of the season whenever I see an Employee on the mountain wearing a helmet I'm going to stop and personnally thank them for setting a safety example for our children. Of course this assumes they are not in the middle of teaching a class, etc.
I realize that there are certain employees who can't wear a helmet because it would indeed mess up their perfectly groomed hair doo and image! It is fairly obvious to identify those who value vanity over safety. My wife used to be in that camp until she was taken out by someone while getting on a chair lift and she wacked her head on the back of the chair - now she won't step on the mountain without a helmet. You never know when someone is going to take you out!
I realize that wearing a helmet is a personal choice but it's almost an embarsement when a ski resort is constantly preaching/advertising safety and yet a subset of their own employees won't even take this simple step of setting an example for kids to follow. Especially Ski Patrol members - quite the irony in promoting safety!
However, I am impressed by the shear amount of kids wearing helmet these days. Maybe the kids are setting the example in this case and the adults need to follow!
Anywho - please join me in thanking employees who actively promote safety!
I think this year the helmet wearing employee ratio was way down at least during my January trip when temps were almost what they are now. Something to do with the spring like weather maybe?
Wear a helmet when it's in the 40s and 50s and the head will sweat and probably explains why many adults will don only the headband or hat.
I agree it's a good thing for kids but individual choice and personal responsibility should prevail, not legislative rules. NSAA said in a statement yesterday following Richardson's death, "the increase in the use of helmets has not reduced the overall number of skiing fatalities. More than half of the people involved in fatal accidents last season were wearing helmets."
I'm definetly not saying we need a law or anything to force people. I realize that if you slam into an aspen tree going wide open on a black run then you will probably be "cooked" even if you were wearing body armor over your entire body.
It's the those freaky little accidents where people really wish they had wore a helmet. Working in the hospital you get to see/hear about these all the time. Examples:
- A kid is standing in the lift line when an out of control skier coming in way too fast slams into the kid. The kid gets whipped back and his head slams into the lift line gate.
- Standing in the Gondola line a skier, with his skis on his shoulder, slips on some ice - whips his skis around as he is falling down and splits open the side of the head of a skier who was standing next to him.
In both of these cases the people turned out to be okay, but they could have probably prevented a trip and costs of the emergency room visit with a helmet on.
It doesn't matter how safe you are - there will always be some accident waiting to happen that can take you out!
Matt, I agree that helmets can help protect against freak accidents, but they are by no means a fix all solution. This brings to mind a story of professional skier, CR Johnson.
He was filming with his normal group of skiers. Totally normal day and they are hitting a small, very easy jump (at least for their standards) one after another as they often do. CR falls, while wearing a helmet, and the skier's ski behind him hits him directly in the head, between his goggles and helmet. CR falls into a coma for nearly a month. He is now learning how to ski again.
Clearly, CR was wearing a helmet and did not turn out to be okay. While this is a freak accident, it was not prevented by a helmet. I stongly believe that wearing a helmet is a personal choice and should be nothing more than that. Too many people get caught up in the belief that a helmet makes them invincible to head injuries and that is FAR from the truth. I have grown up competitivley skiing and have seen an uncountable amount of head injuries while wearing a helmet. If wearing a helmet makes you feel more comfortable go for it, if you don't want to wear one, don't do it. However, creating a new pressure from your employer to wear one is unwelcome. These guys have enough going on. There is no need to make them feel under apreciated just because the other guy working has a helmet on. A think a better idea is congratulating employees for showing up to work on time and giving 100%.
Permalink Reply by Kup on March 19, 2009 at 10:33am
couldn't agree more about the need for a helmet is more based on the 'little' things that happen. As ofr 2 years ago, only my children wore helmets. Then my wife fell going about 5 mph and hit the back of her head. She went immediately to the ski shop and bought a helmet. They talked me into getting one before going to the boat this year. And sure enough, on our last day there, I was going a whopping 5-10 mph and fell back and hit my head. If not for my helmet, it couldve been worse.
I know the boat is a resort, and making money is the bottom line, but I think they should 'throw in' a free rental helmet when you rent skis and boots.
Again, just my 2 cents
Kup
When I started instructing 5 years ago, I bought my first helmet because I thought it was important to set a good example for students. In 18 years of snowboarding I've only had a couple of wrecks where the helmet might have helped, but in 5 years of teaching I've transitioned to where I'm now more comfortable riding with a helmet than without one.
Over the past few years, helmets have really progressed, they're now much lighter, more comfortable, and better looking. There really are very few arguments to not wearing a helmet, but they shouldn't be treated like a cloak of invincibility. Learning proper techniques and riding in conditions and on terrain that is within your ability level, is much more important than any kind of protective equipment you put on.
In my opinion, defensive skiing/riding will do much more to protect you than a piece of plastic and foam rated to protect you from impact at 14 mph, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't wear a helmet as well.
Thought it was worth updating this older discussion to add that Intrawest has new helmet rules for 09/10.
"
VANCOUVER, Oct. 1 /CNW/ – Intrawest today announced that, beginning with the 2009-2010 winter season, the Company will increase awareness of the importance of helmet use at all of its wholly-owned ski resorts in North America. Intrawest will recommend that all skiers and snowboarders visiting its resorts wear helmets and there will be mandatory helmet requirements for all children and youth(1) participants in Ski and Snowboard School Programs as well as all students participating in freestyle terrain park programs, regardless of their age. The new helmet use guidelines underscore Intrawest’s commitment to guest safety and have the support of the National Ski Areas Association (NSAA) and Canada West Ski Areas Association (CWSAA).
...
Looking ahead to the 2010-2011 winter season, Intrawest will require employees to wear a helmet at all times while skiing or snowboarding on-duty in any freestyle terrain park at its resorts. Staff at Intrawest’s Ski and Snowboard Schools will also be required to wear a helmet if they serve as a guide or an instructor for any program that requires mandatory helmet use by a resort guest. Several Intrawest resorts will begin to implement these new employee helmet use guidelines this winter and the remaining resorts will be fully compliant by the beginning of the 2010-2011 winter season.
"
Instructors at Steamboat have previously been required to wear helmets in the park when in uniform, so the only new piece is that between now and 2011 the rule goes in that instructors must wear a helmet if teaching students that are required to wear helmets. Since all kids lessons will now be required to wear helmets, it certainly seems that all kids instructors will be required to wear helmets (although the press release from Intrawest never actually says it, which I find interesting).
As an instructor who always wears a helmet when teaching, and 99% of the time when freeriding, this won't affect me much. However, I am curious about OSHA regulations on required safety equipment. I had heard previously that one of the reasons we didn't require helmets for instructors was that Steamboat would then be required to provide helmets to instructors. Was that incorrect? Have the regulations changed? Did Intrawest find a way around the regulations? Or will Intrawest be purchasing large quantities of helmets? The press release doesn't mention it, but it's an interesting aspect.
Hi Patti. I never wore a helmet either until 2 years ago a simple caught edge at high speed flung me down face first like a mouse trap. My goggles smashed into my face and I ended up with a black eye and some ugly abrasions. A helmet would have braced the goggles. I skied down to Sport Stalker and bought a helmet right then. Now I am my own micro climate! I am much warmer, my goggles or sunglasses never fog up and I could even play music in my helmet if I was that type of skier. Sound dampening is the only drawback. It's a bit comical to hear a group of helmet wearers trying to have a conversation... what?, what was that? say again? what? what? what?
i think we are going to the Sheraton for the Christmas buffet. Others have suggested the Ore House, Cafe Diva alos. Yes book ahead of time. thats what i will be doing next week.